Does Kay Arthur still teach?

Does Kay Arthur still teach?

Kay hosts a daily radio, television and online (www.PreceptsForLife.com) Bible Study Teaching program called Precepts for Life, which walks listeners through the Bible, book-by-book and verse-by-verse, using the Inductive Bible Study Method.

What is wrong with inductive Bible study?

While there is a place for Inductive Bible Study, the potential for errors from context, meaning, culture, and overgeneralization can be common. The result can be great confidence in “Biblical truth” that is much like knowing with absolute certainty that the giant elm tree is “lost, too”.

What is the difference between inductive and deductive Bible study?

Inductive study supplies the analytical Bible knowledge and understanding necessary to deductively build Bible doctrine, and deductive study researches and builds doctrine which informs inductive study concerning the wider doctrinal context of Scripture which then enables inductive study thereby to draw out even more …

What is inductive study method?

For those of you who haven’t heard of Inductive Bible Study (I hadn’t either until I was asked to lead), it’s a method of studying Scripture. This method will help you: Remember what you read–not just move your eyes over the page. Know the main point of a passage and be able to consicly communicate that point.

What is deductive reasoning vs inductive reasoning?

The main difference between inductive and deductive reasoning is that inductive reasoning aims at developing a theory while deductive reasoning aims at testing an existing theory. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to broad generalizations, and deductive reasoning the other way around.

Can a valid deductive argument be unsound?

A deductive argument is sound if and only if it is both valid, and all of its premises are actually true. Otherwise, a deductive argument is unsound. In effect, an argument is valid if the truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion.

Can an unsound argument have a true conclusion?

TRUE: A valid argument cannot have all true premises and a false conclusion. So if a valid argument does have a false conclusion, it cannot have all true premises. Thus at least one premise must be false. If an invalid argument has all true premises, then the conclusion must be false.

How can you tell if an argument is strong or weak?

Definition: A strong argument is a non-deductive argument that succeeds in providing probable, but not conclusive, logical support for its conclusion. A weak argument is a non-deductive argument that fails to provide probable support for its conclusion.

Are all valid arguments true?

All valid arguments have all true premises and true conclusions. If an argument is valid, then it must have at least one true premise. Every valid argument is a sound argument. The following is a valid deductive argument: If it snows, then we will go sledding, just like when we were kids.

Can a valid deductive argument be unsound quizlet?

A deductive argument is sound if its conclusion follows necessarily from its premises and its premises are true. Can a valid deductive argument be​ unsound? A. ​Yes, since the​ argument’s conclusion could be true without it necessarily following from its premises.

Can an invalid argument have a true conclusion quizlet?

If an argument is invalid, then it must have true premises and a false conclusion. Every valid argument has this feature: Necessarily, if its premises are true, then its conclusion is true. Every invalid argument has this feature: It is possibly false that if its premises are true, then its conclusion is true.

What is an invalid argument?

Invalid: an argument that is not valid. We can test for invalidity by assuming that all the premises are true and seeing whether it is still possible for the conclusion to be false. If this is possible, the argument is invalid. Validity and invalidity apply only to arguments, not statements.

Are there any good invalid arguments?

An argument is INVALID just in case it’s NOT VALID. The truth of the premises doesn’t guarantee the truth of the conclusion. That’s ALL it means to call an argument “invalid”. In particular, it doesn’t imply that the argument is bad. As we’ll see in the next lecture, invalid arguments can still be good arguments.

What is a valid argument in critical thinking?

CRITICAL THINKING. CRITICAL THINKING. EVALUATING ARGUMENTS: VALIDITY AND SOUNDNESS. (Deductive) An argument is VALID if, when ALL the premises are true, the conclusion needs to be true as well.

How do you know if an argument is invalid?

To judge if each is valid or invalid, ask the question, “If the premises are true, would we be locked in to accepting the conclusion?” If the answer is “yes,” then the argument is valid. If the answer is “no,” then the argument is invalid.